SUMMARY: PI/DNA plus FITC/PE surface staining

Dr. Howard Petrie (h-petrie@ski.mskcc.org)
Thu, 12 Sep 1996 09:43:12 -0400

There were eleven responses to my original query regarding the use of PI
for DNA content together with PE/FITC for surface fluorescence (posted in
full below). Unfortunately for those of you who might be interested in
this technique, none of them have helped us to solve the PI/DNA plus
PE/FITC-surface staining problem in practice. Part of the problem may have
been that I neglected to mention that the goal is to use a single light
source analytical instrument (FACScan), rather than a multilaser cell
sorter. Consequently, a number of them mentioned the potential use of other
DNA stains (mostly UV excitation) which might be of some use, or the use of
time delay/spatial beam separation, and a few others discussed problems
incurred with using PI as a live/dead stain (which is not a problem in our
hands).

Of the remaining replies, a few (Tom Knapp, Aurora Biosciences; Tom Frey,
B-D Immunocytometry Systems) suggested using a different optical filter for
FL2 (PE) detection; is this a practical approach on a FACScan? Henry
Wortis (Tufts) suggested that a reduction in FL-2 and FL-3 amplification
might help, although Tom Frey (B-D) suggests that a change in PMT voltage
won't help, because PE signal (FL2) will only be detectable over PI (in
FL2) when the PE/PI ratio in FL2 is relatively high (i.e., fourth decade PE
staining, in his estimation). We can only attain this level of staining
with rare antibodies, so it is not likely to help in establishing a routine
procedure for FACScan use.

In summary, there doesn't appear to be a good resolution of this problem
other than to settle for inferior CVs with other DNA stains or to use a
multilaser instrument. I should mention that we have tried innumerable
permutations of fixatives, detergents, incubation times, and temperatures
without improving the CV of dyes like 7-AAD. If there are any other
suggestions from anyone who has successfully used such a method, I'd be
happy to hear them. Otherwise, back to the drawing board...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

Dear Flow Users: I am trying to develop a working method for two-color
surface staining plus DNA content analysis on a FACScan. In my hands, none
of the fixation/permeabilization methods that maintain surface
immunofluorescence generate adequate 7-AAD histograms (high CVs). I have
been concentrating on trying FITC/PE plus PI (ca. 0.5-1 microgram/ml). I
can compensate PE/PI at this level, and CVs are adequate, although
certainly not as good as PI at higher concentrations. The problem I appear
to be having is that (apparent) PE fluorescence disappears when PI is
added. I'm sure it's some compensation dilemma, but I can't seem to make
headway with this problem. Does anyone use such a method, and if so, can
you suggest a compensation protocol? I will repost a summary in the event
of multiple responses. Thanks for your help.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> End of original.

Howard T. Petrie, Ph.D.
Assistant Member, Immunology Program
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Box 341, 1275 York Avenue
New York NY 10021

phone (212)639-2149
fax (212)794-4019
e-mail: h-petrie@ski.mskcc.org


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu