Recharge accounts and federal regulation of them?????

Sue DeMaggio (suedemag@e4e.oac.uci.edu)
Tue, 10 Jun 1997 12:07:47 -0700

On a somewhat related point to core management & funding, I am hearing at
our university that the federal government is saying we can not use
recharge money for the upgrading or purchasing of equipment???? Has anyone
else heard this? It doers't make any sense to me - it is the only money I
have for small equipment addition to existing core facilities without
writing a shared instrument or small instrument grant. Any light anyone
can shed on this would be helpful.

Sue DeMaggio
UC Irvine

At 06:57 PM 6/9/97 -0500, Jonni S. Moore wrote:
>
>In response to Ed Srour's summary of our core operation, I thought I would
>clarify a few points so you all don't think we are without pressures here
>at PENN... While it is correct to say that we are currently operating in
>the black (for the past 2 years) there are a lot of factors that contribute
>to that condition. we too have a Cancer Center core grant that provides
>40% of our operating costs thus chargebacks only have to cover a certain
>proportion of expenses. In addition a portion of our salaries are covered
>by the Department of Pathology outside of the facility. While we do not
>receive any financial support from the University directly, we have
>benefited from parts of program projects and other grants- this is
>important. You need to have a good relationship with your research
>administration to see that these grants get flagged and funds for things
>like service contracts get added. Don't let them get away with just
>budgeting user fees. Yes, there are a few other instruments on campus,
>but we are have the most technically sophisticated instrumentation and the
>only facility that provides both scientific support and training thus we
>are often where most PI's end up. For this reason, we have put all excess
>revenue back into the expansion of services to meet the needs of our users.
>Our goal is to be revenue neutral--we hope to be able to reduce fees in
>the future if we are successful in gaining more outside support.
> In summary, if we depended only on user fees, we would not be in
>the black. To have a successful core, it takes the support of the
>administration at several levels--the result is to the greater financial
>health of the institution by providing the basis necessary to insure the
>success of the PIs in obtaining funds through grants--this is a good point
>to raise in evaluating the success of your facility. It's not just the
>direct dollars and cents, it is the funds generated by investigators
>resulting from the use of your facility.
> Hope this clarifies our situation and emphasizes that a successful
>core takes the contribution of many--I think it would be virtually
>impossible in this day and age to have one based on user fees alone-you
>would have to price yourself out of the market!
>
> Here's to continued (and new) support of our flow labs!
> Jonni
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Jonni S. Moore, Ph. D. (moorej@mail.med.upenn.edu)
>University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
>Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Shared Resource
>Voice: 215-898-3528 Fax: 215-898-4227
>
>
>
>


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors E-Mail Archive Web Sites

CD-ROM Vol 3 was produced by Monica M. Shively and other staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone: (765)-494-0757; FAX(765) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu , EMAIL cdrom3@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu