Re: enumeration of CD34+ cells

Susan & Ulrik Sprogøe-Jakobsen (S&U_S-Jakobsen@dk-online.dk)
Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:28:33 +0200

>Greetings from Cape Town,
>
>I wonder if anyone out there can help me. I would like to set up a
>protocol for accurately quantitating CD34+ stem cells in peripheral
>blood stem cell harvests. It seems that most centres are dual
>labelling with CD45, but I would like some advice on which protocol
>to use as this seems to vary.
>
>I would be very grateful for any advice or any references I could use.
>
>Many thanks in advance,
>
>Glenda Davison
>Dept. Haematology
>Groote Schuur Hospital
>University of Cape Town
>email: gmd@samiot.uct.ac.za

We routinely quantitate CD34+ stem cells in peripheral blod and stem cell
harvest products.
We use a very simple method: whole blood or cell product is labelled with
BDs anti-CD34-PE antibody conjugate, lysed and then acquired on a FACScan
with threshold set on forward scatter. Stem cells are determined as CD34+
cells with low side scatter. Absolute WBC counts are determined on a
hematology counter (Sysmex NE 8000).
We are very satisfied with the method. The stem cell cluster is easily
determined, and the predictability on the stem cell count in the stem cell
product is quite good. We find, that using a second (eg anti-CD45)
antibody complicates things, without giving any extra information.
Normally, we see higher CD34+ percentages when using a CD34 CD45 dual
color protocol.
A workshop for Nordic stem cell transplantation centres held i 1995 in
Herlev, Denmark, in fact revealed, that the major problem concerning
laboratory to laboratory variation in determining absolute CD34+ counts, is
depending more on the method used for WBC counts, than the method used for
flow cytometric deternmination of the CD34+ percentage.
Let me know if you would want a more detailed version of our protocol.

Ulrik Sprogoe-Jakobsen
Dept. Clinical Immunoloy
Odense University Hospital
Denmark


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors E-Mail Archive Web Sites

CD-ROM Vol 3 was produced by Monica M. Shively and other staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone: (765)-494-0757; FAX(765) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu , EMAIL cdrom3@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu