Re: usenet flow cytometry??
Denis Snider (sniderd@fhs.csu.McMaster.CA)
Wed, 24 Jan 1996 21:58:01 -0500 (EST)
I aggree with Steve Gore's comments that a usenet listing would
not be a great idea. My recent experience with bionet.immunology and
sci.med.immunology is that 90% of the chat is concerned with sociological
implications of science (example: "do vaccines really work or is it a big
scam"). I think the present format concentrates the discussion on useful
scientific exchanges among researchers with a genuine interest in flow
cytometry.
------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 23 Jan 1996, jc wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was thinking would it not be a good idea for us to make our flow
> cytometry discussions more accesable, i.e. via usenet.
>
> I don't know if this subject has been brought up before but a news
> group such as bionet.flow-cytometry or sci.med.flow-cytometry can't be
> such a bad idea can it?
>
> Does anybody have any opinion on this.
>
> with best wishes
>
>
> John
>
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories
and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community.
If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL,
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu
EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
