Re: usenet flow cytometry??

Matthias Haury (mhaury@pasteur.fr)
Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:29:15 +0100

I also think that it's not a good idea to put the mailing list on the usenet.

As the archives are available on the web and are updated fast enough, there
is no problem of accessibility. I rather prefer to have the mailing list
continueing like now... it's perfect like it is !

But that's only my personal opinion..

Matthias

>On Tue, 23 Jan 1996, jc wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I was thinking would it not be a good idea for us to make our flow
>> cytometry discussions more accesable, i.e. via usenet.
>>
>> I don't know if this subject has been brought up before but a news
>> group such as bionet.flow-cytometry or sci.med.flow-cytometry can't be
>> such a bad idea can it?
>>
>> Does anybody have any opinion on this.
>>
>> with best wishes
>>
>>
>> John
>>


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu