Re: conjugation vs. sandwich -Reply

John Ladasky (ladasky@leland.Stanford.EDU)
Thu, 27 Mar 1997 18:46:07 -0800 (PST)

> It is far easier to use a sandwich technique, if your primary antibody is
> unconjugated. This can be successfully used even with 2 and 3 color stain-
> ing.
> Trying to conjugate an antibody is time consuming and expensive if you are
> buying the unlabeled antibody. You need sufficient antibody to start - at
> least 100 ug and 1 mg would be better. After conjugating you must remove
> excess FITC, unconjugated and over conjugated antibody.
>
> If you need protocols for sandwich techniques, I'd be happy to send them.
>
> Best regards,
> Tony Bakke
> bakkea@ohsu.edu

Is this always a better idea? I did an experiment a while back in
which I used indirect ("sandwich") staining with an antibody against MHC
class I. By the time I got around to the analysis, the light scatter prop-
erties of the cells that were positive for my antibody were all out of whack,
as if I had stimulated them. It reminded me of a technique I once used for
stimulating T cells, in which you added anti-CD3-biotin and then streptavidin.

So, if cross-linking the antigen in question would stimulate your
cells, perhaps you want to use direct-labeled antibodies. Comments?

- John Ladasky
ladasky@leland.stanford.edu


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors E-Mail Archive Web Sites

CD-ROM Vol 3 was produced by Monica M. Shively and other staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone: (765)-494-0757; FAX(765) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu , EMAIL cdrom3@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu